Who is Angela McDougall? Wiki, Biography, Age, Family, Incident Detail

Angela McDougall Wiki – Angela McDougall Biography

Angela McDougall, 44, who has 115 prior offenses on her record, was locked up for nearly six years after being convicted of trafficking Class A narcotics three times in 23 years.She was arrested again last year in a police drug raid after officers discovered she was driving a racket of heroin and crack cocaine from her home in Winsford, Cheshire. She had £95,000 deposited into her bank account in just nine months through £20-50 drug deals. The dirty money would be quickly transferred to an unknown accomplice, and by the time she was apprehended she had only £413 left. McDougall breached a clause under the Sentencing Act 2020, which advises drug dealers to face a minimum of seven years in prison if caught selling Class A narcotics three times in their adult life. Several men have been jailed under legislation that came into force in December 2021, but no woman is believed to have previously been jailed under the latest ‘three strikes’ rule. In 2000, McDougall was 22 when she was jailed for two years for supplying heroin and in 2003 she was given another three and a half years after being caught smuggling crack and cocaine. heroin at Altcourse Gaol in Liverpool.

She also has eight prior convictions for Class A drug possession, some as recent as 2020 and 2021, plus felony burglary and theft, and has also repeatedly violated a series of non-custodial court orders meant to help her stay clean. Lawyers said she had been hooked on heroin and crack since she was a teenager and she had returned to dealing because her partner, who is also a drug addict, had been diagnosed with cancer. In Chester Crown Court McDougall, who admitted to being involved in supplying heroin and crack and possession of cannabis and crack, pleaded for clemency but Judge Michael Leeming jailed her for five years and eight months. a history of failing to take advantage of opportunities she presented to him by the court over the years that were designed to help him break her criminal cycle. She continued with this offense but was not deterred. The last custody sentence for her was as recent as 2018. No sentence has paid for her crime.

She added: ‘This was not a unique incident as £95,000 flowed in and out of her accounts, showing that she was close to a major distributor, if not oneself. It is important that the courts do not undermine Parliament’s intent by accepting exceptional circumstances too easily. ‘You have not made determined efforts to address your drug use and there is nothing to suggest that you have changed your life since 2003. You have not worked since 2013 when you were sober and have a partner who is also a dependent drug user . You played an important role in this crime and you knew what you were doing. You know better than anyone how addictive Schedule A drugs can cause. The court heard that police raided McDougall’s home on July 25 last year after a tip. Prosecutor Jayne Morris said: “Her partner was present at the scene and small amounts of cannabis were found during the property search along with a small crack wrapper, £205 in cash, two white iPhones and a Samsung mobile phone.

Angela McDougall Age

Angela McDougall is 44 years old.

Incident Detail

Mobile phones were seized and analyzed and a report showed that there were numerous messages related to the supply of class A drugs, both crack and diamorphine. The messages are very frequent. It is very clear that this defendant was heavily involved in the supply of Class A drugs during that time period, approximately a nine month period. An analysis of her bank transactions showed payments from several different people entering her bank account, amounts of £25, £50 and £100. Sometimes one person would transfer three different amounts of money in one day. The exact sum of £95,845.86 was deposited and £95,469.72 was withdrawn. There was £413 left in her account.’ She said in an interview that she was receiving £1,000 a month in benefits and Universal Credit. To this were added sums of money related to the supply of drugs. She said that she was using class A drugs, heroin and crack and that she was spending around £30 to £40 a day to ease her habit.

She said the phones were hers. She said that she used them to play games and that there would be nothing in them related to the supply of drugs. That is clearly not the case.’ Investigations were made into McDougall’s financial assets, but the court heard that investigators would not be seeking any proceeds from the enforcement of crime. In mitigation, defense counsel, Mr Robin Howat, said: “There are factors in childhood of this defendant that led her to being involved in drink and drugs as a way of self-medicating for those traumas.’Between the last two qualifying offences there is a considerable period of time, the gap of almost 20 years. The first occurred due to a abusive relationship she was in, the second was not street supplying. Those drugs were being taken into a prison.’There can be very few cases if any where there is a gap of 20 years between the offending. She suffers from DVT (deep vein thrombosis), through the abuse of drugs. and also has severe asthma. She has nothing in the world apart from the bags that she brought to court.

‘This is not a case that she is said to have the trappings of crime. Regarding the money that went through her account, she was being used and the dealer was getting her to work off her debt by channelling the money, holding the phone and dealing with the drugs on their behalf.’It’s clear that when one sees her physical state and one tries to interact with her, she’s still someone in the depths of addiction. She was given drugs to do this operation and fell back into it because of her partner who is also severely addicted.’She has cancer and a severe heart problem. She was unable to manage her own habit. Therefore, rightly or wrongly, Miss McDougall took on that role to support the both of them because of the debts accrued in the drug market.’She has fallen prey to other people in her life who have exploited her situation. She is not someone who is benefiting a great degree other than subsistence drug use.’

Note: We strive to generate original and high-quality articles. Content posted on Wikibious.com may not be republished, copied, or redistributed, in whole or in part, without acknowledgment or permission. This article is for educational purposes only and the information mentioned here may not be 100% correct. We are collecting information from our sources, if you have any problem with the item, you can tell us. Follow us on Facebook.